Forget situationships, ‘convenience dating’ is what modern romance looks like now

It’s 2026, and if you’re still stuck on situationships and friends with benefits, it may be time to expand your dating vocabulary. Because right now, almost everyone is considering convenience dating. We spoke to millennials and experts about why it feels fair, practical, and increasingly common.

While a certain Bollywood couple’s alleged ‘joke’ about being in a situationship got the internet talking, the truth is that a sizeable bunch of us are no longer chasing happily-ever-afters as much as we are chasing convenience. Sure, you may not be game for situationships or FWBs, but in the current economy, if you were being brutally honest with yourself, would you really say no to convenience dating, especially if Cupid has never exactly worked in your favour? We asked experts and millennials to take a closer look at the idea.

Why convenience dating feels practical right now

“From a therapeutic lens, what we’re now calling ‘convenience dating’ reflects a shift in how people are negotiating emotional risk in uncertain times,” says Ragini Rao, co-founder at InfinumGrowth. “In a fast-paced, economically pressured environment, relationships that demand less time, clarity, and long-term commitment can feel fair and sometimes even practical. They offer companionship without the perceived weight of responsibility.”

For 26-year-old Ravi Gupta*, a media professional, convenience truly trumps emotion. “I think it ultimately depends on what you seek from a relationship. In modern, frenetic lives, convenience trumps all other emotions, even something as overpowering and intense as love. Many get tired of not finding their special one and eventually settle for something close to perfect,” he says.

He adds that easy, low-maintenance companionship is what most people are really looking for. “I feel that a relationship based on convenience can be just as nourishing if it’s built on respect, care, and a little compromise. I’ve seen people stay in relationships long after the spark is gone so they can split exorbitant rent and other expenses, and maintain a lifestyle that may not be possible if they were apart.”

When practicality starts to outweigh romance

With the many lifestyle stressors people are dealing with today, the requirements of a ‘happy relationship’ have changed drastically, often making practicality feel more valuable than intense emotional investment. Neha Sharma, a content professional, believes most people are simply focused on doing what works for them. And there is no universal rulebook for what is right or wrong.

“There shouldn’t be any room for guilt if you’re okay with choosing factors other than love when getting into a relationship. At 30, I’d rather be with someone who respects me and makes my life easier than someone I have great chemistry with. Sure, you can marry for love, but nothing in the world guarantees you’ll feel the same way a couple of years down the line. So I’d say choose wisely,” Sharma says.

The emotional cost of keeping things convenient

But while this model may reduce immediate pressure, it can also bypass the very foundations that sustain emotional well-being, such as trust, respect, and love.

“These dynamics can work when both individuals are operating from a clear adult state, where communication is direct, expectations are stated, and there is awareness of one’s own needs and limits,” Rao explains. “In such cases, the lines don’t blur easily because both people are consciously choosing the structure of the relationship.”

However, when those elements are diluted, what often follows is ambiguity: needs remain unspoken, expectations become misaligned, and emotional consequences quietly begin to build.

Over time, this can lead to subtle but significant emotional fallout. People may find themselves engaging in psychological ‘games’: seeking validation, avoiding confrontation, or staying trapped in loops of uncertainty that can be quietly draining. The impact is not always immediate, but it often surfaces later as confusion, emotional fatigue, or difficulty forming secure attachments.

“If one chooses convenience dating, boundaries become critical. Clear communication about expectations, emotional availability, and limits is essential to prevent harm. Without that clarity, what feels convenient in the short term can become emotionally costly in the long run,” Rao concludes.

Ultimately, relationships that endure and nourish us require investment, not just of time, but of emotional honesty and intention. But with clarity and boundaries, you are allowed to choose what feels right for you, even if it doesn’t fit the conventional script.

Lead image credit: IMDb 

Also read: Low-effort dating is no longer cute, it's actually embarrassing

Also read: Soft-launching a relationship is more stressful than being single