
Every friend group has one. You mention you’ve had a stressful week, and before you’ve finished the sentence, you’re hearing, “You think that’s bad? Let me tell you what happened to me!” You ask, “How was your holiday?”, and by the second sentence of the answer, you’re being walked through their travels, itinerary included. You came for a chat; you stayed for a keynote.
Yeah. That’s not a catch-up. That’s a TED Talk. And, as we said, every group has one. Often, it’s us. (Sorry.) The conversation hog is rarely the loud bore at the party. More often, it’s the warm, well-meaning buddy who genuinely believes they’re connecting, a bit like Ross Geller, who never met a story he couldn’t make about himself.
The tell-tale signs
“A conversation is a shared space, not a stage for one person to perform,” says Manik Kaur, etiquette expert and mindful living coach. The giveaways are subtle. “One of the subtler signs of a conversation hog is the tendency to turn someone else’s experience into a story about oneself.” Add to that unsolicited advice when someone simply wants to be heard, oversharing before there’s any rapport, constantly bringing up one’s achievements, and a compulsion to fill every silence. Check the other side of the table, too. When friends start giving shorter answers or stop sharing details with you, take the hint.
Dr Prajakta Gupte, consultant psychiatrist at Jupiter Hospital, Thane, suggests a post-chat quiz. Do people have to interrupt you to finish their thoughts? Do you give advice before understanding what the other person needs? Can you recall everything you shared, but struggle to remember what they told you? Her best test: “Did I understand something new about the other person, or did I mostly talk about myself?”
Why we do it
So why do we do it? “There isn’t one single reason,” says Gupte. For some, it’s a need for validation; for others, social anxiety, insecurity, excitement, or plain habit. Kaur adds discomfort with silence and the urge to show off what we know. Plenty of people also genuinely believe that sharing a similar experience is the best way to say, “I get it.” And if you grew up in a home where conversations were a contest of competing stories, interruptions, and instant solutions, you may never have learnt otherwise. “The behaviour does not necessarily indicate selfishness or a lack of empathy,” she says.
Then there’s the blind spot: we judge ourselves by our intentions, and everyone else by their behaviour. “We know that we meant well when we interrupted, so we may not see it as a problem,” says Gupte. The friend on the other end only experiences the interruption, and may read it as disinterest.
Empathy vs ego
The line between connecting and hijacking is thin. “Empathy says, ‘I want to understand your experience.’ Ego says, ‘I want you to understand mine,’” says Kaur. Take a breakup. “I went through a terrible breakup last year, too. I couldn’t sleep for weeks” is a decent start; your friend feels understood. Spend the next 15 minutes on your ex, your recovery and your life lessons, though, and her heartbreak has quietly left the building. Gupte’s better version: “I went through something similar, and I remember how hard it was. How are you doing?” Your story is the bridge back to them, not the destination.
Sharing isn’t the villain here. In a 2013 study, people who reciprocally shared personal information during initial encounters liked each other more, felt closer, and felt more similar than those whose conversations were less reciprocal. Research by Susan Sprecher and Stanislav Treger in 2015 also found benefits in taking turns. Mind you, reciprocity doesn’t mean equal airtime. “It means ensuring that both people feel seen, heard, and valued,” says Kaur. A grieving friend may rightly need more of the mic.
The quiet cost
Being on the receiving end rarely feels dramatic. It starts as a small disappointment: you share good news, and they talk about their own; you voice a worry and receive a list of solutions you never asked for. Repeated often enough, and you stop confiding. “I’m fine” becomes easier than explaining yourself again.
Psychologists call what’s missing perceived partner responsiveness—the degree to which we feel another person understands, validates, and cares about our experiences. It’s considered an important ingredient of intimacy. When one person is always heard, and the other is always expected to listen, the friendship goes lopsided. “The listener can begin to feel more like an audience or an unpaid counsellor than a friend,” says Gupte. An unpaid gig, again.
Phase or pattern?
Before you cancel anyone, though, context matters. Someone dealing with grief, burnout, or a breakup may have little energy left to ask questions, and that’s not a character flaw. A persistent pattern shows up even when there’s no crisis. Gupte offers three yardsticks. Frequency: is this occasional, or most of their conversations? Reciprocity: over time, do they make room for others? And responsiveness to feedback: when someone says they feel unheard, can they listen, reflect, and try to change? The third, she says, is especially revealing.
And please don’t call your hog a narcissist. “Conversational narcissism” can be a useful way to describe the behaviour, but it isn’t a diagnosis. Narcissistic personality disorder is a distinct condition that must be assessed by a qualified mental health professional, and interrupting a lot or struggling to listen doesn’t establish it. Describe the behaviour, not the person. “I often notice that our conversations return to your experiences before I have finished sharing mine” works far better than “You are a narcissist.”
How to un-hog yourself
The good news: you don’t have to turn into a mime. Kaur’s mantra for these times is simple: listen more and speak less, because we so often listen with the intention of responding rather than understanding. Both experts agree on a few moves.
Pause before responding. Instead of “That happened to me, too,” try “That sounds like it was really difficult. What happened next?” Ask one genuine follow-up, like “How did that make you feel?”, and actually listen to the answer. Check before advising: “Would you like me to help you think through a solution, or would you prefer to talk it out?” Read the room; shorter answers or repeated attempts to speak may mean someone needs more space, though cues should be read in context. And if you’ve been going on for a while, hand it back: “I’ve been talking about my situation, but I want to come back to what you were saying.”
Oops, I did it again
Already hogged a chat? No need to spiral or over-apologise. Try: “I realised I spent a lot of time talking about myself earlier. I’m sorry I didn’t give you enough space to share. I’d like to hear more about what you were telling me.” Then comes the crucial bit: follow through by listening. Don’t overcorrect, either. No stopwatches, no suppressing every anecdote; that only makes conversations stilted. You could also ask a trusted friend for honest, specific feedback.
“Etiquette, at its heart, is mindfulness in action,” says Kaur. In a world where everyone wants to speak, she adds, the willingness to truly listen has become one of the most valuable social skills. The real measure of connection, Gupte reminds us, is not how much we manage to say, but whether the other person felt there was space for them, too. So the next time a friend says it’s been a rough week, just ask, “What happened?” Then, for once, let them have the mic.
Lead image credit: Pexels
Also read: Why everyone needs a 'doorbell friend' in their late 20s
Also read: Do your friends really need to be friends with each other?